|
|
trends |
strategies |
American Family
| steps |
home |
ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN FAMILY? IF SO,
UNCLE SAM WANTS YOUR TAXES!
NEW US TAX COLLECTION STRATEGIES MAY IDENTIFY YOU AS A
US CITIZEN AND A TAXPAYER WITH A WHOPPING TAX BILL!
By David S. Lesperance, Barrister & Solicitor
There
are several million people living around the world who may
be unknowingly committing US tax evasion each year. The US
government labels them as "non-resident non-filers" and
until now has been unable to collect taxes from (or even identify)
these individuals. This situation has existed ever since the
United States re-introduced its current income tax regime at
the time of the First World War.
Times
are, however, changing dramatically. The Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) now has the means to find these individuals and collect
outstanding taxes, interest, and penalties from assets located
outside the US. Given the current political climate in Washington,
where normal corporate tax avoidance planning is labeled "unpatriotic",
there is a renewed passion to expose these non-resident non-filers
and apply the full force of US law against them.
For
illuminating articles on the current political climate in Washington
with respect to legal corporate tax avoidance conduct a Google
search using the keywords "Stanley Tools Bermuda".
Are
you going to receive an unexpected US tax bill?
To answer this question we need to clarify several basic elements
of US tax and citizenship law:
Fact 1: A US tax payer is anyone who is either
a US citizen, OR a resident alien, OR is physically present in
the US for a specified number of days.
Most
noteworthy is the fact that a US citizen who does not currently
reside in the US is still subject to US taxation. This is true
even if the individual inherited US citizenship from their
parents but have NEVER set foot in the US. Indeed many non-resident
non-filers are completely unaware that the US has a taxation
system (unique in the developed world) that is based on "citizenship".
These are people who often pay local taxes in the country where
they live and where their tax liability is most likely based
on residence. They are, therefore astounded to discover that
the US taxes citizens who live abroad and who may never have
received any type of service from the US government. They are
even more appalled to learn that they themselves may be taxable!
Fact 2: The US allows dual citizenship.
Many
individuals mistakenly assume that they automatically lose
their US citizenship (and tax liability) when they move abroad
and acquire a foreign citizenship or when they reach adulthood. "Losing US citizenship is not easy. About the only way
you can lose your citizenship is if you renounce it," according
to Robert Mautino, a San Diego immigration lawyer who is a leading
expert on US citizenship law. The concept of dual citizenship
is well established in US law and one does not lose their US
citizenship without taking drastic and active steps to do so.
Fact 3: If you are born outside the United States to
a US parent, you do not have to register with the US government
to be deemed to have acquired US citizenship.
Many individuals mistakenly assume that they are
not US citizens because, while they may have been eligible for
US citizenship through one or both of their parents, the US government
was never notified of their birth. Only in rare situations are
foreign-born US citizens deemed to have lost their US citizenship
because of a failure to fulfill subsequent US residence requirements.
It is also worth noting that the individual does not escape their
deemed US citizenship because only one of their parents was an
American or because their parents never married.
You
may be a non-resident, non-filer
but you haven't filed
US tax returns for 40 years
why should you worry now?
Many
non-resident non-filers believe they have permanently fallen
off the IRS radar screen because they left the US many years
ago, took up residence and citizenship abroad, and have not
received an IRS tax assessment since their departure. Others
believe they will never appear on the IRS radar since their
US parent(s) never advised the American government of their
existence or, although they were born in the US, they left
before they were old enough to file a tax return or even apply
for a Social Security Number. Several trends are converging
that will make the "IRS radar system" increasingly
powerful in the future.
The
first obvious development is the computerization of various
US government records relating to birth, death, adoption, marriage,
name change, immigration, citizenship, passport, selective
service, voter's registration and social security. This computerization
greatly increases the ability of the IRS to "data-mine" and
find non-resident non-filers. Events such as the US election
fiasco in Florida and the current war on terrorism have also
resulted in increased funding and motivation to combine and
compare information that may be collected at a local, county,
state, or federal level. These changes are also occurring internationally
as the US signs Mutual Legal Assistance and tax treaties with
foreign countries. The war on drugs, money laundering, and
terrorism are certainly fueling rapid international sharing
of information with the US.
The
second trend is that the US has been actively searching for
non-resident non-filers. In 1992, the IRS launched a "non-filer
program" to locate nonresident non-filers. The first step
taken was the institution of a requirement that an IRS information
return be completed in conjunction with the processing of US
passport applications. This system was only partially effective
as many Americans either did not travel inter-nationally or
already had another foreign passport and simply did not need
to renew their US travel document.
The third step in uncovering non-resident non-filers
was taken in 1999, when the Qualified Intermediary regime (QI)
came into effect. The QI regime saw financial institutions (brokerage
firms, banks, life insurance companies) entering into direct agreements
with the US government despite being located in financial privacy
jurisdictions. These institutions agreed to enter into QI agreements
in exchange for on-going access to US securities markets for all
their clients. By the end of 2001, over 1000 financial institutions
had signed on as Qualified Intermediaries. This group consists
of almost every reputable international financial institution
including most private banks. The full impact of the QI program
will start to be felt in 2003.
Entering into a QI agreement calls for the financial
institution to implement client review mechanisms that determine
if new or existing clients are subject to US tax. This client
review mechanism is also designed to uncover clients who hold
foreign passports indicating a US birthplace or those who were
born abroad to a US parent. If any client proves to be a US taxpayer,
the financial institution submits a report on the client's brokerage
account to the IRS and withholds and remits the appropriate tax
to the US government. The client then has to apply to the IRS
for any entitled refund. If the prior existence of the account
has not been disclosed on the client's US returns (or no returns
exist), they will face some very hard questions from US tax authorities.
The QI agreement also allows for the seizure of the client's entire
assets (held by the QI) if the IRS asserts that there is an outstanding
tax liability.
The
fourth method used to expose non-resident non-filers is the
recently enacted "Uniting and Strengthening of America
by Providing Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism
Act of 2001" (USA Patriot Act). The Patriot Act will uncover
those last remaining non-resident non-filers who may have bank
but not brokerage accounts. The Patriot Act requires all foreign
financial institutions that have a correspondent banking relationship
with a US bank to disclose (upon request) the name, and personal
and business background of the ultimate individual beneficiary
of all accounts held in the foreign institution. Foreign and
offshore financial institutions that require US correspondent
banking relationships are those that offer services such as
the processing of US checks, US money orders, US dollar accounts,
or execution of US wire transfers. Financial experts unanimously
warn against dealing with offshore financial institutions that
have not entered into a correspondent banking relationship
with a US bank (i.e. non-Patriot Act compliant), as the US
dollar is the defacto worldwide currency of business. Lack
of US correspondent banking relationships would severely hamper
an institution's ability to function and its absence would
probably signal inherent instability.
The fifth method in the hunt to identify non-resident
non-filers was the recent (and successful) action by the IRS to
find those US taxpayers who may be purchasing goods and services
with credit cards linked to undisclosed offshore accounts. The
IRS has, in over 30 countries, successfully forced MasterCard,
American Express and Visa International to provide information
on their cardholders.
As
a follow-up, the IRS recently won court-ordered "John
Doe" summonses to obtain credit card transaction records
from some 44 companies that may have sold consumer services
and retail products to offshore credit card holders. This group
of merchants includes everything from airlines to The GAP
stores and even E-Bay. John Doe summonses are used for "fishing
expeditions" - where the IRS knows there is a good chance
of finding tax offenders but are unable to identify them by name
until after their investigation is complete.
It is anticipated that the combination of information
obtained by the IRS from the credit card issuers and merchants
will help identify those customers who paid for products or services
by way of a credit card linked to offshore bank accounts that
may have been established to evade US taxes.
The latest initiative to uncover non-resident non-fillers
is the intensified scrutiny by immigration officials at US ports
of entry. Overseas visitors who fly into the US have noticed a
marked increase in the scrutiny of their documentation. Individuals
who have foreign passports listing US birthplaces are now being
told that they are required to secure US passports or be denied
entry to the US. Another consequence of the computerization and
sharing of information is that individuals born overseas to US
parents will inevitably find this fact displayed on a US Immigration
officer's computer screen.
Even those people entering the US through Canada
are discovering they are under increasing scrutiny. Indeed, Canadian
citizens and permanent residents who wish to enter and stay in
the US for more than 30 days are now required to undergo as detailed
an examination and documentation procedure as those who enter
the country on overseas flights.
The combined effect of all these efforts will be
the complete disclosure (to the US government) of all non-resident
non-filers who:
a) travel to the US;
b) hold a bank account with a bank that has a US correspondent
banking relationship;
c) hold a brokerage account in any financial institution in the
world; or
d) hold and use a major credit card.
When IRS "data-mining" hits its full stride, those final few non-resident
non-filers who thought they were well hidden will undoubtedly be uncovered and
pursued.
You
may be a non-resident non-filer
but you earn less
than the US foreign earned income tax exemption and pay local
tax to
a country that has a tax treaty with the US that eliminates dual
taxation ... Why should you worry?
Exemptions for foreign earned income or foreign
tax credits for foreign tax paid are only available to those individuals
who file US tax returns before the expiry of the relevant limitation
periods. In short, an individual who does not file a US return
may end up paying tax twice (i.e. local and US) on the same income
or capital gain. It is important to note that these exemptions
and credits do not apply to all types of income or capital gains.
Furthermore, since the US imposes estate and death
taxes, this may prove to be a new and exclusive tax liability
that non-resident non-filers (and their financial advisors) may
not have contemplated if their current tax homes do not impose
this type of taxation
Even
if the IRS does find and assess you, how will they collect their
taxes when your income and assets are all outside of the US?
The US Government has signed new or amended tax
treaties with a number of countries that allows the IRS to use
local tax authorities to collect on out-standing US tax debts.
One of the first tax treaties that included this collection power
was the Canada-US tax treaty (this treaty has subsequently been
used by the US as a precedent when entering into or revising tax
treaties with other countries). As a result, if the non-resident
non-filer has any assets within a country that has this type of
tax treaty with the US, they will find these assets are as subject
to seizure as they would be if located in the US
It is apparent that the IRS now has many avenues
at their disposal to seize assets around the world to satisfy
a US tax debt.
If
you suspect you may be a non-resident non-filer, what can you
do today to head off a disastrous US tax assessment and collection?
Step 1: Confirm your current US citizenship
or resident alien status.
Step 2: Obtain an assessment of the
costs involved to voluntarily file US returns and then pay any
outstanding US taxes. (Voluntarily filing of US tax returns for
the past three years eliminates the assessment of any penalties
over and above the taxes and interest owed).
Step 3: Obtain an assessment of future
US income, capital gains and estate tax liability and explore
the ways of lowering that liability through legitimate tax avoidance
planning.
Step 4: If your future US tax liability
after tax planning is still significant, then explore your ability
to ultimately sever US tax liability by giving up your US citizenship
or resident alien status.
Conclusion
If you can identify with any of the persons or situations
described within this article, you may be surprised to learn that
you are not only a member of the American family, but you are
also liable to Uncle Sam for past and future taxes. It may be
difficult, if not impossible; to change the past, but the future
is in your hands.
... continue steps
| top |
|